3 ms·
Yes, implementation wise underneath in most cases they're likely some structs/pointers/whatever, but the point was that interaction with them from the perspecti
by w7 3y ago
Yes, implementation wise underneath in most cases they're likely some structs/pointers/whatever, but the point was that interaction with them from the perspective of an application running on the JVM is not the same as what the JVM sees itself, nor are the same exact operations available-- you'd have to create abstractions or use implementation specific jdk.internal.misc.* calls, and at that point why are you using the JVM.