> Not everything needs to IPO or be called a unicorn or whatever. I definitely agree, but for social networks you do need some volume unless it is very specifi

> Not everything needs to IPO or be called a unicorn or whatever. I definitely agree, but for social networks you do need some volume unless it is very specific, but this creates some catch 22 paradox. I am a member of more than one specific subject, free Slack communities, on the small-medium scale, with un-verified identities. I don't get junk messages, spam recruiters or other inappropriate approaches, I assume the reason is that the size of the communities is not big enough to attract those. On the other hand I would agree to pay for such small-ish community which attract top talent and is highly moderated, but it seems that it is not needed in real life.