4 ms·
Looks fine I guess, but (like Ruby) it's not as intuitive as Python, and I have a lot of hopes that Mojo will bring about a performant Python like programming e
by coryaf 3y ago
Looks fine I guess, but (like Ruby) it's not as intuitive as Python, and I have a lot of hopes that Mojo will bring about a performant Python like programming experience
- pmarreck 3y agothis must be a matter of opinion, because I always thought Python was a crappier Ruby
- czbond 3y agoSame. Python always seemed like it was cobbled together poorly. While to me, Ruby seemed to be elegant experience. I used Ruby because I really don't like the "programming part" - but the "I'm creating a product ASAP, the language is the method of having to do so" part. I drank the Go koolaid (hoping for a C++ variant) but felt like I was using C or Assembly (har) in having to recreate practically everything ground up.
- pmarreck 3y agoI could never stand Go. So much boilerplate. Literally designed to appeal to the most inexperienced developer. Write 4 times as much code to do the same amount of work as 1 line of Elixir or any functional language... Gross.
- bantunes 3y agoRuby is Python minus white space mandates and having to try three times to get strings right. Also, backwards compatibility is not such a big deal. Of course, also minus the massive corporate support by the likes of Google. Try it, it's very programmer-friendly.