4 ms·
Too exploitable in two ways: First failure mode is that the metric for two bills being “the same” will be too narrow, in which case the rule will be ineffectiv
by fardo 3y ago
Too exploitable in two ways:
First failure mode is that the metric for two bills being “the same” will be too narrow, in which case the rule will be ineffective due to legislators playing with the punctuation or paragraph structure, or
Second failure mode is that the rule will be too broad and this becomes a weapon which would increase gridlock even further.
By providing parties and non-majority fringe groups within them the option to “damn bills by weak praise” into the future, legislators working adversarially could propose a bill they don’t want to pass, veto it, argue any successor bills are “the same bill”, and now, they’ve effectively enshrined the state of the issue for the next X years.
- dspillett 3y agoThird failure mode: a party in power with a strong majority now but losing the lead rapidly, could scupper a near future opposition in power by raising motions the other side(s) might like to enact and voting them down to hell, so the forced delay means they are stuck or have to be watered down to work around the delay rule.
- hhjinks 3y agoThat's just a more specific version of the second failure mode.