Ah. It weakens my point, but I'll say it anyway: you do need to be able to tell the difference between good and bad responses to use it to make you more efficie

Ah. It weakens my point, but I'll say it anyway: you do need to be able to tell the difference between good and bad responses to use it to make you more efficient. I definitely wouldn't use it blindly for things I don't know much about at this point. Pretending I know my Pade from my Maclaurian, I'd follow up with: "use the better Pade approximation".