4 ms·
This is small: https://www.radiantnuclear.com/ https://www.radiantnuclear.com/ Yes, I understand it isn't comparable (1.2MW). But portable doesn't require cons
by nimrody 3y ago
This is small:
https://www.radiantnuclear.com/ https://www.radiantnuclear.com/
Yes, I understand it isn't comparable (1.2MW). But portable doesn't require construction. Surely something in-between can be built?
- acidburnNSA 3y agoIf you like that one, you'll also love an actually-operated version of this: ML-1 from the 1960s. It operated out in Idaho at the National Reactor Testing Station. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML-1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML-1
- cduzz 3y agoThat article is _hilarious_ "Extensive shielding was omitted in favor of a personnel exclusion zone of 500 feet (150 m) while in operation"