Well rather than "ethical" licensing, I'd argue this is "moral" licensing, and as usual, morals differ. For example: > (m) To provide medical advice or medical

Well rather than "ethical" licensing, I'd argue this is "moral" licensing, and as usual, morals differ. For example: > (m) To provide medical advice or medical results interpretation that is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment; This seems particularly overly broad -- there is a lot of benefit for people with no access to a doctor of any kind that is left on the ground by excluding that use case. The problem of bad advice is hard, but it's one that will likely become increasingly solved as the tech evolves, and this seems to exclude this model from that technological progression.