4 ms·
I was referring to the link, not the top-level comment The link was posted as an earlier example of the comment it was replying to.
by mellosouls 4y ago
I was referring to the link, not the top-level comment
The link was posted as an earlier example of the comment it was replying to.
- uoaei 4y agoIf the link is satire, it's indeed quite opaque. For panpsychists it is a legitimate question that, if explored, helps clarify the levels of awareness and agency that occur in different objects vis a vis conscious experience.
- mellosouls 4y agoYes, I agree. I thought the original comment I was replying to was just in the same tradition of the link as dismissing the concept as silly without really understanding it (or worse, understanding it and trivialising the approach).