6 ms·

Show me another profession that can have such a dramatic impact on the bottom line where your work makes the company 100x-1000x your salary. If anything SWE are

Show me another profession that can have such a dramatic impact on the bottom line where your work makes the company 100x-1000x your salary. If anything SWE are underpaid, we should be getting a slice of total business unit revenue. With my last job doing SWE for a bank, I know for a fact that my code saved the company hundreds of thousands dollars just from one project, and I know for a fact that some of my other code oversaw over a billion dollars in loan volume annually. And what do I get come review time? No salary change and a variable bonus. It's fucking bullshit. These motherfuckers are getting rich off my back and they don't even share. Even 5% of revenue split across my entire team would be a million-plus or everyone, but nooooooooo we cant have that now can we? Whatever will the pathetic shareholders ever do then???

decafninja 3y ago
Well, you worked at a bank. Other than a few niche roles like algo trading, banks do not pay SWEs particularly well. Nor are they particularly well respected. You play second or third fiddle to the traders. SWEs at FAANG and other top tier tech companies are at a completely different level of compensation. I don’t think they’re underpaid.
- kevstev 3y ago
  I worked in Algo trading at a bank. Banks do not pay SWEs that work in algo trading well. I left finance to work in tech and got a 50% bump right off the bat. And I was well paid on my team- the h1s and kids out of school were not breaking 100k. I know the guy sitting in my old seat and 10 years later he is maybe getting that 50% more while I have 4xed. He works 50-60 hour weeks like I did as well and I rarely go past 45. And this was ten years ago when this stuff was the hot thing. This myth that big banks pay anyone in tech well needs to be dispelled. I worked at a few as well and they were all the same.
  - google234123 3y ago
    Algo trading and even general swe at the top places (e.g. citadel) will pay better than the top tech firms.
    - decafninja 3y ago
      The top finance firms like Citadel, Jane Street, Two Sigma, and the like have the best paying tech roles, but also comparatively much fewer of them than FAANG and the top tech companies. They're also extremely difficult to get into. I don't remember where but I read someone saying it's easier to get an offer from all letters of the FAANG pantheon than it is to get an offer from Jane Street. Also different banks pay better or worse. Goldman is the top of the hierarchy and pays competitively with a mid tier tech company depending on your team and role. JP Morgan is second place. The rest of the pack (BoA, Citi, UBS, WF, others) probably can't compete with most tech companies.
      - kevstev 3y ago
        Agree. Worked in the first group as well and it paid well and legit valued it's employees. The hours became a bit abusive at the end so I followed one of my bosses there to a firm he went to. But that's how I made the jump to 4x.
sbierwagen 3y ago
>we should be getting a slice of total business unit revenue Start a company then. Pay is not determined by value, it's determined by leverage. The CEO pays himself the most money because he controls the company, he's not going to pay anyone lower than him more than he makes.
- PeterisP 3y ago
  CEO doesn't "pay himself the most money"; CEO pay is not decided by the company executives but directly by the shareholders/board.
  - sbierwagen 3y ago
    How many companies pay VPs/senior employees more than the CEO outside of hedge funds?
- reaperducer 3y ago
  >we should be getting a slice of total business unit revenue Start a company then. Or go back in time 40 years. It used to be very common for companies to give a portion of the yearly profits to the employees. It was called "profit sharing." Somehow that perk evaporated in the tech industry.
  - SamReidHughes 3y ago
    It's publicly traded and they pay RSUs.
    - reaperducer 3y ago
      The two aren't mutually exclusive.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]
dann0 3y ago
You're discounting the people that identified the opportunity, scoped out and defined the project, and then briefed you about what was needed. Sales, Marketing, and GTM are absolutely generating 100x - 1000x their salary if they take sole ownership of a project like you are doing. SWEs are good are solving problems, but other people determine which problems to pay attention to, and how much investment to make in them.
- JoeAltmaier 3y ago
  In some companies, yes. In other engineering-driven companies it's the other way around. In many organizations, marketing is just asking customers what they want. E.g. ask a farmer from the turn of the century, they'd have said "I want a horse that pulls harder and eats less oats!" They'd never have said "I want a tractor!" It's Engineers that conceive of tractors.
  - dann0 3y ago
    Hard disagree. Marketers conceive of tractors. They are the ones by talking to the customers and knowing what they need. They are the ones that know that one engineer has been working on a high power engine, and other on rugged, high traction trailers. Purely engineering firms fail in the long run as they drift away from what buyers want and chase interesting things because they think they know better.
    - bazmattaz 3y ago
      I would’ve agreed with you if you had swapped marketers for product managers. Marketers coming up with ideas and dictating those ideas to engineers is just wrong
    - moomoo11 3y ago
      Cough meta cough
      - selimthegrim 3y ago
jimmygrapes 3y ago
Well... between Apr 6, 2023 and the time of this post I have single-handedly brought in >1.2MM for the place I work. From initial customer contact to service provided to billing to negotiation (there's always negotiation after billing) to payment received and deposited, me alone. I got a $25 gift card yesterday (along with my [relatively low] regular and overtime pay throughout, of course). And I'm ok with that, tbh. I could get frustrated and envious and bitter, but I also couldn't have done that without the decades of brand awareness and business infrastructure and equipment and facility and support staff keeping all the rest of it going. I see it as that revenue paying the salary of other people so that they can do other things that leave me able to do my part. I refuse to play the "I did the work for this job so I deserve it all" game.
ssklash 3y ago
You've just described what Marx identified 150 years ago.
chronic94939 3y ago
> Show me another profession that can have such a dramatic impact on the bottom line where your work makes the company 100x-1000x your salary. High frequency trading / propriety trading firms (buy-side) make FANG TC look like public teacher TC. 400-600K USD for 22-year old new grads. With 5 YOE, TC of $1M+ is not uncommon . If you do really well, $10M+ annual TC is possible with 5-10 YOE. Even mid-career employees get fixed % cut of company profits. I’m not even talking about the company partners either. So yes, FANG SWEs are underpaid.
- decafninja 3y ago
  The total number of roles in HFT firms and other top finance companies that pay tech employees that well are tiny compared to the number of roles in FAANG. Along those lines, the number of SWEs in FAANG are tiny compared to the legions upon legions of SWEs working at nontech companies where a 60yo staff engineer retires with compensation similar to a FAANG 25yo junior engineer. The comparison is even more dire if you bring non-US jobs into play. I’ve heard a typical Venetian gondolier is paid more than an Italian SWE. So I disagree a FAANG engineer is underpaid compared to the vast majority of their peers at other companies. FAANG is an anthill, and HFT firms are a wart on an ant’s thorax compared to the Mt. Everest that comprises the legions of companies that pay far, far less.

decafninja 3y ago

Well, you worked at a bank. Other than a few niche roles like algo trading, banks do not pay SWEs particularly well. Nor are they particularly well respected. You play second or third fiddle to the traders. SWEs at FAANG and other top tier tech companies are at a completely different level of compensation. I don’t think they’re underpaid.

kevstev 3y ago
I worked in Algo trading at a bank. Banks do not pay SWEs that work in algo trading well. I left finance to work in tech and got a 50% bump right off the bat. And I was well paid on my team- the h1s and kids out of school were not breaking 100k. I know the guy sitting in my old seat and 10 years later he is maybe getting that 50% more while I have 4xed. He works 50-60 hour weeks like I did as well and I rarely go past 45. And this was ten years ago when this stuff was the hot thing. This myth that big banks pay anyone in tech well needs to be dispelled. I worked at a few as well and they were all the same.
- google234123 3y ago
  Algo trading and even general swe at the top places (e.g. citadel) will pay better than the top tech firms.
  - decafninja 3y ago
    The top finance firms like Citadel, Jane Street, Two Sigma, and the like have the best paying tech roles, but also comparatively much fewer of them than FAANG and the top tech companies. They're also extremely difficult to get into. I don't remember where but I read someone saying it's easier to get an offer from all letters of the FAANG pantheon than it is to get an offer from Jane Street. Also different banks pay better or worse. Goldman is the top of the hierarchy and pays competitively with a mid tier tech company depending on your team and role. JP Morgan is second place. The rest of the pack (BoA, Citi, UBS, WF, others) probably can't compete with most tech companies.
    - kevstev 3y ago
      Agree. Worked in the first group as well and it paid well and legit valued it's employees. The hours became a bit abusive at the end so I followed one of my bosses there to a firm he went to. But that's how I made the jump to 4x.

sbierwagen 3y ago

>we should be getting a slice of total business unit revenue Start a company then. Pay is not determined by value, it's determined by leverage. The CEO pays himself the most money because he controls the company, he's not going to pay anyone lower than him more than he makes.

PeterisP 3y ago
CEO doesn't "pay himself the most money"; CEO pay is not decided by the company executives but directly by the shareholders/board.
- sbierwagen 3y ago
  How many companies pay VPs/senior employees more than the CEO outside of hedge funds?
reaperducer 3y ago
>we should be getting a slice of total business unit revenue Start a company then. Or go back in time 40 years. It used to be very common for companies to give a portion of the yearly profits to the employees. It was called "profit sharing." Somehow that perk evaporated in the tech industry.
- SamReidHughes 3y ago
  It's publicly traded and they pay RSUs.
  - reaperducer 3y ago
    The two aren't mutually exclusive.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]

dann0 3y ago

You're discounting the people that identified the opportunity, scoped out and defined the project, and then briefed you about what was needed. Sales, Marketing, and GTM are absolutely generating 100x - 1000x their salary if they take sole ownership of a project like you are doing. SWEs are good are solving problems, but other people determine which problems to pay attention to, and how much investment to make in them.

JoeAltmaier 3y ago
In some companies, yes. In other engineering-driven companies it's the other way around. In many organizations, marketing is just asking customers what they want. E.g. ask a farmer from the turn of the century, they'd have said "I want a horse that pulls harder and eats less oats!" They'd never have said "I want a tractor!" It's Engineers that conceive of tractors.
- dann0 3y ago
  Hard disagree. Marketers conceive of tractors. They are the ones by talking to the customers and knowing what they need. They are the ones that know that one engineer has been working on a high power engine, and other on rugged, high traction trailers. Purely engineering firms fail in the long run as they drift away from what buyers want and chase interesting things because they think they know better.
  - bazmattaz 3y ago
    I would’ve agreed with you if you had swapped marketers for product managers. Marketers coming up with ideas and dictating those ideas to engineers is just wrong
  - moomoo11 3y ago
    Cough meta cough
    - selimthegrim 3y ago

jimmygrapes 3y ago

Well... between Apr 6, 2023 and the time of this post I have single-handedly brought in >1.2MM for the place I work. From initial customer contact to service provided to billing to negotiation (there's always negotiation after billing) to payment received and deposited, me alone. I got a $25 gift card yesterday (along with my [relatively low] regular and overtime pay throughout, of course). And I'm ok with that, tbh. I could get frustrated and envious and bitter, but I also couldn't have done that without the decades of brand awareness and business infrastructure and equipment and facility and support staff keeping all the rest of it going. I see it as that revenue paying the salary of other people so that they can do other things that leave me able to do my part. I refuse to play the "I did the work for this job so I deserve it all" game.

ssklash 3y ago

You've just described what Marx identified 150 years ago.

chronic94939 3y ago

> Show me another profession that can have such a dramatic impact on the bottom line where your work makes the company 100x-1000x your salary. High frequency trading / propriety trading firms (buy-side) make FANG TC look like public teacher TC. 400-600K USD for 22-year old new grads. With 5 YOE, TC of $1M+ is not uncommon . If you do really well, $10M+ annual TC is possible with 5-10 YOE. Even mid-career employees get fixed % cut of company profits. I’m not even talking about the company partners either. So yes, FANG SWEs are underpaid.

decafninja 3y ago
The total number of roles in HFT firms and other top finance companies that pay tech employees that well are tiny compared to the number of roles in FAANG. Along those lines, the number of SWEs in FAANG are tiny compared to the legions upon legions of SWEs working at nontech companies where a 60yo staff engineer retires with compensation similar to a FAANG 25yo junior engineer. The comparison is even more dire if you bring non-US jobs into play. I’ve heard a typical Venetian gondolier is paid more than an Italian SWE. So I disagree a FAANG engineer is underpaid compared to the vast majority of their peers at other companies. FAANG is an anthill, and HFT firms are a wart on an ant’s thorax compared to the Mt. Everest that comprises the legions of companies that pay far, far less.