> The books I'm referring to are extremely sexual and graphic in nature. And if the content of those books isn't appropriate for YouTube, I don't see any proble

> The books I'm referring to are extremely sexual and graphic in nature. And if the content of those books isn't appropriate for YouTube, I don't see any problem with a local government banning that material from schools. Sure, of course pornographic materials don't belong in schools. But this is clearly not the case at all, and is being used as a strawman to drive all sorts of issues, just like I enumerated with sources for you. Do you care to enumerate the sources which can actually show instances of pornographic materials being banned from schools that previously contained them, i.e. not just for show? That would be meaningful. Currently, despite your assertion of enlightened centrism, you talk a lot like a Republican