Yes, I was trying to be polite. Charging $99/month (or other amounts) in connection with unlicensed use of trademarked properties associated with one of the mo

Yes, I was trying to be polite. Charging $99/month (or other amounts) in connection with unlicensed use of trademarked properties associated with one of the most actively monetized intellectual property brands is probably not a good idea and is likely to result in an unpleasantly costly education in trademark law.