For the landlord situation, what's the additional harm here if the facial recognition system is inaccurate for people of a certain skin color? From the article

For the landlord situation, what's the additional harm here if the facial recognition system is inaccurate for people of a certain skin color? From the article, the concern here is that the landlords are "trying to find ways to expedite ways of flushing people out of the building". Presumably this tech could make it easy to identify tenants violating their lease agreement. For example, detecting repeat non-residents using keys to enter the building as a sign of illegal subletting. But if the face rec system incorrectly identifies someone for potential lease violations, the landlord still needs to go through additional human verification and present proof to a judge to start the eviction process. Especially in NYC, the landlord needs to go to court with a lot of evidence to secure an eviction. So it seems like inaccurate facial recognition would be good for the tenants. If the results are inaccurate enough it eventually defeats the whole purpose of the system. (this is very different from situations like Madison Square Garden's use of face rec, where a someone might be denied entry unilaterally because of misidentification and have no recourse)