4 ms·
Oh that's interesting. I thought the linked review study was what they were referencing. Why would they reference a study as the basis for the entire article wi
by sosodev 3y ago
Oh that's interesting. I thought the linked review study was what they were referencing. Why would they reference a study as the basis for the entire article without linking to it? .-.
This really seems like bad journalism for the sake of clickbait.
- autoexec 3y agoIt feels like I see this a lot more recently and not just with science articles. Someone will write an entire article about a subject and never provide enough information for anyone to reach any informed opinion about it at all. It might be an article about a controversial statement someone made, but they'll never quote or link to what was actually said and instead only talk about the drama surrounding it. When the article is about the text of a proposed law, the law is rarely linked to and is often not even named. It feels like I see way more links to random people's tweets from news sources than links to actual sources. I guess commentary gets more clicks than content, but I the content is what actually matters and is usually what I'm interested in.
- Hxfso-1 3y agoInteresting observation!