Okay but > To avoid misleading the public, the images included text stating that they were produced by AI. So doesn’t this really only impact the people… care

Okay but > To avoid misleading the public, the images included text stating that they were produced by AI. So doesn’t this really only impact the people… careless enough not to RTFA? And then we get this hackneyed parting shot, parroting common myth/misconception about AI generated images: > AI-generated images stitch together photographs previously taken by humans to create new ones… Which, no, that makes it sounds like a collage, > …raising questions of plagiarism and in photojournalism and the industry’s future. Torres said Amnesty’s use of AI images was an insult to the photojournalists who cover protests from the frontline. “Won’t someone please think of the photojournalists!” I am not impressed with this article.