3 ms·
> It can achieve better uptime, if you ignore the downtime for upgrades, the downtime for configuration errors, the downtime when the disk fills up... Besides
by capableweb 3y ago
> It can achieve better uptime, if you ignore the downtime for upgrades, the downtime for configuration errors, the downtime when the disk fills up...
Besides the last one, the others you can schedule when developers are not actually working on something, or give a headsup so developers can be prepared in case of errors.
In the case of GitHub, Microsoft deploys changes whenever they want, whenever you want it or not.
- joshmanders 3y ago> In the case of GitHub, Microsoft deploys changes whenever they want, whenever you want it or not. That's because GitHub is used by millions of people every day all over the world. Business hours for them are around the clock. No matter when they update, if it breaks something, many people will hear about it regardless of when the break was deployed.
- capableweb 3y agoYeah, this is exactly my point, their needs don't overlap with your needs, hence sometimes it's better to self-host, because then it's 100% your needs that gets taken care of.
- RealStickman_ 3y agoGood planning and monitoring will also prevent the last point from becoming a problem.