3 ms·
"People will not pay for a restricted model when free, unrestricted alternatives are comparable in quality. . ." I'll take the opposite side of that bet - MSFT
by aresant 3y ago
"People will not pay for a restricted model when free, unrestricted alternatives are comparable in quality. . ."
I'll take the opposite side of that bet - MSFT / Goog / etc in the providers side will drive record revenues on the back of closed / restricted models:
1 - Table stakes for buying software at enterprise level is permissions based management & standardized security / hardening.
2 - The corporate world is also the highest value spender of software
3 - Corp world will find the "proprietary trained models" on top of vanilla MSFT OpenAI or Goog Bard pitch absolutely irresistible - creates a great story about moats / compounding advantages etc. And the outcome is going to most likely be higher switching costs to leave MSFT for a new upstart etc
- IceHegel 3y agoI agree with this over the next 10 years but disagree over the next 30. When/If the innovation slows down, the open source stuff will be able to out compete commercial options. Something like this timeline played out for databases and operating systems.