3 ms·
I’m not offended that we act as if someone aged 17 and 11 months is definitely unfit in a way that could never be the case after age 18. If that were true then
by fundad 3y ago
I’m not offended that we act as if someone aged 17 and 11 months is definitely unfit in a way that could never be the case after age 18. If that were true then only a minimum voting age is required.
In reality I can drag my great grandfather to the polls and vote for him so you should be able to vote for your kids.
Who is more impacted by government than parents or people caring for ailing parents?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- candiodari 3y agoPerhaps it's more to the point that your problem wouldn't be solved by lowering the voting age, as that would still not give you a perspective tens, hundreds ... thousands of years into the future. You'd have to get people to vote 1000s of years before they're even born.