Like culi, I read that as specific to the goal of expanding the "AI workforce" with new workers. I don't follow where you project the "creation of new roles far

Like culi, I read that as specific to the goal of expanding the "AI workforce" with new workers. I don't follow where you project the "creation of new roles far removed from core activities," from what I can see it has nothing to do with changing how individual businesses manage their hiring and staffing. The remark about diversity comes near the end of the block, after all the discussion about inter-agency collaboration, and seems, to me, to specifically refer to the goal to "bolster America’s AI R&D infrastructure and support the development of a diverse AI workforce." America is a very diverse country. A network of NSF institutes that is designed to expand America's AI R&D workforce will by definition create a diverse workforce if it effectively serves all Americans. I don't see why that's particularly objectionable at face. I definitely cannot figure how to read that paragraph and project forward to this future state: >the company's mission shifts from customer and safety focus, to pacifying employee agendas. From what I can read, the Institutes aren't going to be directing companies to do anything.