5 ms·
My read was that part of the value add of these new institutes is paying more people to do AI work, thus creating a larger AI workforce in the US and giving the
by rockemsockem 3y ago
My read was that part of the value add of these new institutes is paying more people to do AI work, thus creating a larger AI workforce in the US and giving the US a competitive advantage.
It seems like a no-brainer to try and make that growing workforce come from diverse backgrounds because that will just help AI skills permeate throughout society even more, thus increasing the workforce advantage.
- giantg2 3y agoConsidering the nature of AI systems, it seems this would create monopolies in various domains and AI devs will never exceed a single digit share of the IT workforce.
- Dalewyn 3y ago>try and make that growing workforce come from diverse backgrounds If one's race is in question, that is racism no matter how you ice that (very rotten) cake. Same goes for sexism. Give equal pay and treat everyone equally, do not care for and be blind to one's race and sex. That is equality. Trying to manipulate the distributions is discrimination.
- zmgsabst 3y ago[flagged]
- Dalewyn 3y agoAs a Japanese (aka Asian, aka minority) American, I will say this: One party constantly calls me by a wide variety of labels, the other party treats me like just another man and American. I know which party I'm voting for, and it doesn't start with the letter D.