5 ms·
In terms of "proof", I can't imagine what you'd accept as proof that I'd want to post here. In terms of risk, benign is a pretty good word for it, and we've bee
by hairofadog 3y ago
In terms of "proof", I can't imagine what you'd accept as proof that I'd want to post here. In terms of risk, benign is a pretty good word for it, and we've been using another processor for years and years without any issues on that front.
I think Stripe is well within their rights to do all the due diligence they feel they need to do; I just wish they had done it before we signed a contract and started taking payments, and it does feel like we dodged a bullet by not agreeing to the Minimum Fee Commitment.
- MichaelZuo 3y agoLinking to a real identity at least will make it easier to accept. Using a pseudonym simply adds an extra layer of doubt.
- eaenki 3y agowould you share that other payment processor?
- hairofadog 3y agoWe’re currently using Cybersource, owned by Visa. I argued for moving us over to Stripe because Stripe offered a better rate, and their UI, APIs, reporting, and documentation are much nicer than Cybersource’s. I had also argued for and worked with Stripe at my previous job in a much riskier sector — event ticketing — for years, and never had a problem, so it felt like a no-brainer.