3 ms·
They're implying that the Google brand has such a terrible reputation in terms of privacy that anything touched by it - even if it's just the name - is not trus
by alpaca128 4y ago
They're implying that the Google brand has such a terrible reputation in terms of privacy that anything touched by it - even if it's just the name - is not trustworthy in many people's eyes. And privacy violations can't be reversed, by the time you have tangible evidence it's too late.
At this point Google is mainly known as online tracking company which loves to cancel projects, and they put a lot of effort into building this image to a point an observer can get the impression it's not an accident.
- endisneigh 4y agoliterally FUD. do you have anything substantial to show with respect to GCP privacy violations?
- mixmastamyk 4y agoYour skepticism is backwards.