Your comment has me confused. First you say > Google needs to be innovative, build new products and invest in them. and then > Take a look at what went on at

Your comment has me confused. First you say > Google needs to be innovative, build new products and invest in them. and then > Take a look at what went on at Meta. They took the money they could've returned to investors and lit it on fire. You're criticizing Zuck for doing exactly what you said Google should do. Granted the price tag was huge, but you can't innovate without building and testing something first.