4 ms·
> no capitalist would pay for someone to do something useless The issue here is definition of useful/useless. If you manage to market regular rocks as magical
by MatekCopatek 3y ago
> no capitalist would pay for someone to do something useless
The issue here is definition of useful/useless. If you manage to market regular rocks as magical and convince people to pay a lot of money for them, a capitalist will gladly pay for everything from digging to shipping of those rocks.
From a common sense perspective that activity is useless because it's purely wasting resources with no useful effect.
From a capitalist perspective the activity is not useless as it brings profit.
- flappyeagle 3y agoIt’s axiomatic. If someone is willing to pay then it’s by definition not useless. Pet rocks are fine as a luxury good. That’s what a wedding ring is.