I think serverless has its place, but this problem doesn't seem like a fantastic fit. We are looking into serverless as a way to exhibit to our customers that

I think serverless has its place, but this problem doesn't seem like a fantastic fit. We are looking into serverless as a way to exhibit to our customers that we are strictly following certain pre-packaged compliance models. Cost & performance are a distant 2nd concern to security & compliance for us. And to be clear - we aren't necessarily talking about actual security - this is more about making a B2B client feel more secure by way of our standardized operating model. The thinking goes something like - If we don't have direct access to any servers, hard drives or databases, there aren't any major audit points to discuss. Storage of PII is the hottest topic in our industry and we can sidestep entire aspects of The Auditor's main quest line by avoiding certain technology choices. If we decided to go with an on-prem setup and rack our own servers, we'd have to endure uncomfortable levels of compliance. Put differently, if you want to achieve something like PCI-DSS or ITAR compliance without having to covert your [home] office into a SCIF, serverless can be a fantastic thing to consider. If performance & cost are the primary considerations and you don't have auditors breathing down your neck, maybe stick with simpler tech.