I’m sorry I was apparently hard to follow. I meant, the author cites anecdotes (“here’s a paper that’s not open!”) rather than data (“of the 500 most-cited pap

I’m sorry I was apparently hard to follow. I meant, the author cites anecdotes (“here’s a paper that’s not open!”) rather than data (“of the 500 most-cited papers in the AI space, 82% were not open, compared to only 36% of papers in anthropology being non-open”). And, I meant if you pick any other discipline that produces thousands of academic papers a year, I will be able to find 20 that don’t count as open. Anger often makes it hard to understand things.