3 ms·
But it does change the fact that 6 searches/day will probably not be adequate for the average kagi user, which they imply.
by oh_sigh 3y ago
But it does change the fact that 6 searches/day will probably not be adequate for the average kagi user, which they imply.
- freediver 3y agoThat is not implied anywhere? The copy clears says internet users and provides concrete sources for the claim. How would you word it differently?
- cmeacham98 3y agoThe obvious implication of putting that on a pricing page is that the average internet user accurately represents the average Kagi user. I have no idea if that's true or not, but if it isn't, then there isn't really a way to "word it differently" - including the information at all is misleading.
- freediver 3y agoI addressed it here not to repeat again https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35810191 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35810191
- brookst 3y agoI’m trying to follow the complaint but not getting it. Are you saying that the average Kagi user, who is an internet power user doing far more than 4 searches a day, is going to be misled into believing they are an average internet user and that they really only do 4 searches a day?