4 ms·
About a month ago we saw very similar headlines that turned out to be misleading. The FBI posted a warning about juice jacking. The FBI left off that there's no
by iudqnolq 3y ago
About a month ago we saw very similar headlines that turned out to be misleading. The FBI posted a warning about juice jacking. The FBI left off that there's no evidence it has ever happened and their post was only based on a 2019 press release by another agency stating that the hack might be possible.[1]
This article is source to a local news article.[2] The assertion that scammers could use QR codes to deliver malware is the only fact in the article without a citation. The security expert they interview is warning about phishing pages, like a sticker on a parking meter that leads to a fraudulent payment site.
It's also odd they cite only to "the FBI". These articles tend to cite either to a specific FBI spokesperson or to a specific FBI office. It's possible the journalist took the interview with the security expert and merely found something on some FBI website in order to get the better headline.
[1]: https://slate.com/technology/2023/04/free-public-phone-chargers-fbi-warning-bad-actors-threat-bogus-debunked.html https://slate.com/technology/2023/04/free-public-phone-charg...
[2]: https://abc-7.com/news/cover-story/2023/05/01/fbi-warns-of-qr-scamming-trend-on-the-rise/amp/ https://abc-7.com/news/cover-story/2023/05/01/fbi-warns-of-q...
- asdfman123 3y agoWhether or not this particular thing is true, everyone should automatically downvote Daily Mail articles when they see them unless they’re specifically looking for fun celebrity tabloids to read. It’s not a good news source. Find the story written by a better publication and link to that.