4 ms·
I don't think you get the point of applying the entirety of the evidence together outside of just saying "well its still blurry, case dismissed." There is hard,
by oldstrangers 3y ago
I don't think you get the point of applying the entirety of the evidence together outside of just saying "well its still blurry, case dismissed." There is hard, credible evidence from reputable eye witnesses. There is hard, credible evidence of these objects moving in a manner that's inconsistent with any known technology we have.
- arrrg 3y agoThat evidence is utterly unconvincing. Please pull yourself out of this mirage and away from falling prey to disinformation.
- oldstrangers 3y agoDisinformation? That would imply we're being intentionally misled about what the objects are. In which case, nothing I've said contradicts that, regardless if it's terrestrial based or otherwise.
- nomel 3y agoI’ve never seen this framed as a disinformation campaign. It seems like the opposite, with all of the agencies now taking it seriously: a “get information” campaign.