Your response it needlessly insulting. The person you are talking about has taken a complex topic and expressed their model for consciousness in a short, clinic

Your response it needlessly insulting. The person you are talking about has taken a complex topic and expressed their model for consciousness in a short, clinical way. Then you insult them as not being a real human for describing their model clinically. A more charitable response might be: I don't understand how your model addresses the origin of consciousness. Could you elaborate on that? Personally, I understood their point and didn't question whether a human wrote it.