4 ms·

The "LIZ" also doesn't really exist. There's no quantifiable way to measure it outside of just agreeing that something is hard to make out. Some of these newer

The "LIZ" also doesn't really exist. There's no quantifiable way to measure it outside of just agreeing that something is hard to make out. Some of these newer videos are well within the range of whatever the camera's capability is. Targeting systems also don't have "Low Information Zones" for known objects. They enter a "Low Information Zone" when the craft they're targeting starts doing things that are unexplainable. Is the craft creating the LIZ in that case?

George83728 3y ago
None of the Navy videos depict anything clearly. That's not a coincidence.
- oldstrangers 3y ago
  I don't think anyone has cared so much about what they look like as opposed to how and what they're doing when they do see them. There's also numerous first hand accounts from extremely reputable people that sort of do away with the need for high resolution photos. Taking everything together, the case is a lot more compelling than just "UFO because zoom can't zoom any better, the end".
  - George83728 3y ago
    You've completely missed the point of the article, and numerous times again when others tried to explain it to you. So I'll try one last time: If the aliens were real, at least some of the videos would show them clearly. None of the videos show them clearly, and that's not a coincidence. The only reason the videos are discussed at all is because the objects in the videos are not clear. > what they're doing when they do see them. They aren't shown to be doing anything strange. All of the videos show mundane movement. You're being tricked by parallax. > extremely reputable people It all boils down to "navy pilots wouldn't lie to me". It's a complete joke.
    - oldstrangers 3y ago
      >If the aliens were real, at least some of the videos would show them clearly. Says who? Did I miss the memo? >It's a complete joke. The Pentagon seems to take it seriously enough, even creating the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office to track "anomalous, unidentified space, airborne, submerged and transmedium objects." Least they're having a laugh with it!

George83728 3y ago

None of the Navy videos depict anything clearly. That's not a coincidence.

oldstrangers 3y ago
I don't think anyone has cared so much about what they look like as opposed to how and what they're doing when they do see them. There's also numerous first hand accounts from extremely reputable people that sort of do away with the need for high resolution photos. Taking everything together, the case is a lot more compelling than just "UFO because zoom can't zoom any better, the end".
- George83728 3y ago
  You've completely missed the point of the article, and numerous times again when others tried to explain it to you. So I'll try one last time: If the aliens were real, at least some of the videos would show them clearly. None of the videos show them clearly, and that's not a coincidence. The only reason the videos are discussed at all is because the objects in the videos are not clear. > what they're doing when they do see them. They aren't shown to be doing anything strange. All of the videos show mundane movement. You're being tricked by parallax. > extremely reputable people It all boils down to "navy pilots wouldn't lie to me". It's a complete joke.
  - oldstrangers 3y ago
    >If the aliens were real, at least some of the videos would show them clearly. Says who? Did I miss the memo? >It's a complete joke. The Pentagon seems to take it seriously enough, even creating the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office to track "anomalous, unidentified space, airborne, submerged and transmedium objects." Least they're having a laugh with it!