4 ms·
Fair use training, then BS ToS on fair output usage. Then using the funding to intimidate GitHub repo owners for banal stuff. It's like Google or AWS telling y
by villgax 3y ago
Fair use training, then BS ToS on fair output usage. Then using the funding to intimidate GitHub repo owners for banal stuff.
It's like Google or AWS telling you that you can't use their API/compute to train a competing Speech-to-Text model lol
- nivenkos 3y ago"Open"AI
- hombre_fatal 3y agoHacker News? More like "Hacker" "News" amirite guys?! XD This quip is so trite and boring. We have to come up with something more scathing than this. I'm begging us.
- rzzzt 3y agoOpen "AI"
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- villgax 3y agoWe're beyond their company name/work relation or even the non-profit to profit turn over. We're pissed at them willy nilly scraping the internet citing fair use for something which is neither research nor itself governed under fair use when they want to limit how people use the outputs or share the outputs with another 3rd party. Just like how Facebook wanted a partial internet, these guys want to screw over the rest of similarly