2 ms·
> Anecdotally I can say that trying to enable `-XStrict` in production caused performance issues that prevented us from trialing it further. hah this is in man
by whateveracct 3y ago
> Anecdotally I can say that trying to enable `-XStrict` in production caused performance issues that prevented us from trialing it further.
hah this is in many ways indirect proof that laziness-by-default is improving performance. It may even be that a rote translation to strict (which `-XStrict` does) is causing _time_ leaks, which are actually pervasive in production strict-by-default code.
- ParetoOptimal 3y ago> hah this is in many ways indirect proof that laziness-by-default is improving performance. I believe this is the case, but the times it saves you are invisble. The occurences where it bites you though are very visible and made out to be a much bigger deal than they usually are.