This was not my understanding so I looked it up and found this: https://www.reuters.com/business/legal/us-supreme-court-nixes-appeal-over-forced-password-disclo

This was not my understanding so I looked it up and found this: https://www.reuters.com/business/legal/us-supreme-court-nixes-appeal-over-forced-password-disclosure-2021-05-17/ https://www.reuters.com/business/legal/us-supreme-court-nixe... Wherein it mentions passwords are considered testimonial and therefore protected by the 5th, but device passcodes were ruled to be exempted under the “forgone conclusion” exception to the 5th (TIL about that). Is this kind of thing you are referring to?