I can see why. One is a whimsically-named, serious language. The other is a seriously-named, whimsical language (from what I can tell). (It's also somehow stra

I can see why. One is a whimsically-named, serious language. The other is a seriously-named, whimsical language (from what I can tell). (It's also somehow strange to see the author photos accompanying that article, I guess since for one, unlike many other -lang-article-photos, these seem fairly up-to-date, turning the popular-language-with-old-photos wiki-norm on its head)