3 ms·
> There are far more missing nuclear submarines than I would have ever expected Of all nuclear accidents, these are easily the least concerning. For one, only
by George83728 3y ago
> There are far more missing nuclear submarines than I would have ever expected
Of all nuclear accidents, these are easily the least concerning. For one, only two western nuclear submarines have ever been lost and those were well publicized, nobody should be surprised by those. The Soviets/Russians lost quite a few, which I don't think many people would find surprising, but it's really not a big deal anyway from an environmental perspective. Sea water is excellent shielding, the wrecks are now used as habitats for all kinds of sea life which is unfazed by the radiation. As for heavy metal pollution, ocean water already has several billion tons of uranium and other heavy metals dissolved in it, naturally. A few more tons from a few reactor cores is nothing.
Quite frankly, we should view deliberately dropping old nuclear reactors into the ocean as a practical and economical method of disposal. In fact, the Soviets and the UK have deliberately done this several times and (the US and Switzerland did too, to a much lesser extent.) There is no evidence that any of this has caused any harm to the environment.
- bequanna 3y ago> Quite frankly, we should view deliberately dropping old nuclear reactors into the ocean as a practical and economical method of disposal. Imagine the optics! If this is a good solution it would most certainly have to be done by governments in secrecy.
- FooBarBizBazz 3y agoMaybe they should be buried deeply, in subduction zones, far from human habitation, so that they are pulled deep into the Earth by plate tectonics.