28 ms·
It has to do with what the chips can support. Compare the AMD USB channels [1] with the Intel Thunderbold channels [2]. Intel has more channels for motherboard
by mfer 3y ago
It has to do with what the chips can support.
Compare the AMD USB channels [1] with the Intel Thunderbold channels [2]. Intel has more channels for motherboard/system manufacturers to work with.
[1] https://www.techpowerup.com/cpu-specs/ryzen-7-7840u.c3212#gallery-2 https://www.techpowerup.com/cpu-specs/ryzen-7-7840u.c3212#ga...
[2] https://www.techpowerup.com/cpu-specs/core-i7-1370p.c3055#gallery-2 https://www.techpowerup.com/cpu-specs/core-i7-1370p.c3055#ga...
- rektide 3y agoIt's such a pity AMD revolutionized bandwidth & interconnectivity on Epyc (128 lanes PCIe) , but has left consumers hanging. Threadripper HDET was 64 lanes (the Pro really was a full Epyc, 128 lanes, 8 channel memory) but now Threadripper is gone. Meanwhile desktop & mobile have been so capped, at 20 - 24 lanes, right where we were. The Thunderbolt 4 abilities of Intel chips is just stunning. 160Gbps of connectivity, usable for host to host connectivity... I wish AMD were trying to catch up here, wouldnt compromise their lead by being so far behind here.