4 ms·
Probably because they could potentially be saving the company money. I will probably get downvoted for this but companies don't care about people. They might m
by avgDev 3y ago
Probably because they could potentially be saving the company money.
I will probably get downvoted for this but companies don't care about people. They might make it seem like they care but they don't. If a company decides they can perform same or better by improving efficiency and cutting 10% of jobs that is a huge WIN for the business. CEOs are not there to make friends and be kind. Their job is to plan for the future of the company, not Bob slinging code in the back.
- sharemywin 3y agobut didn't they steer the ship int he wrong direction in the first place? And if your the size of Amazon aren't you able to find things for them to do? Wouldn't more training help? I'm not talking about let someone go for cause.
- avgDev 3y agoRetraining takes time and money. People are not always easy to retrain. People will be unhappy about any pay cuts. Sometimes it is best to let them go. CEO often cannot predict exactly what the economy will do and what the clients will do. Their decisions can be based on data but it doesn't mean they can predict the future. To be frank, I am not saying this is right or wrong. This is reality of business.