3 ms·
Disagree on your second point. There's a very clear distinction between reporting the facts on the ground and literally making photos up.
by jack_riminton 3y ago
Disagree on your second point. There's a very clear distinction between reporting the facts on the ground and literally making photos up.
- version_five 3y agoAren't we talking about some graphics in a promotional campaign? I didn't interpret this as "reporting".
- alistairSH 3y agoThat's not what this report claims... posting images generated by artificial intelligence in order to promote their reports on social media If they wanted to use AI-images, they could have used any number of filters/effects to reduce the phot0-realism and make it clear the images were illustrations (vs "photos").
- XorNot 3y agoWell that would be relevant if they'd demonstrated any interest in actually reporting facts on the ground correctly.