4 ms·
Sidebery for Firefox is integrated with profiles pretty well. In general, the article seems to be an overly excited marketing pitch for yet another closed sour
by orbital-decay 4y ago
Sidebery for Firefox is integrated with profiles pretty well.
In general, the article seems to be an overly excited marketing pitch for yet another closed source Chromium-based browser, the main feature of which seems to be a... vertical tab bar? Which seems to be mimicking Sidebery to a close degree? Underwhelming.
- seaal 4y agoAs someone that has actually used the browser for the past few months, it’s really about the flow and UX. Arc fits in the MacOS environment and has many small flourishes that just feel good. There has been a steady stream of new features, my favorite one being Peek which opens up a temporary page on top of the one your current tab.
- aestetix 4y agoI had not heard of Sidebery, I'll have to check it out. Thanks!
- cassianoleal 4y ago> Sidebery for Firefox is integrated with profiles pretty well. Sorry, but no. This is from someone whose main browser is Firefox with Sidebery. Sidebery can be configured to have a relatively low integration with containers - not profiles. You could argue that containers are very similar to profiles, and in a sense they are - but there's no deeply integrated UI/UX between Sidebery and containers. The spacial isolation Arc does by tying a space to a profile is much stronger and IMO much easier to grok than anything with Firefox and containers.