3 ms·
I always thought that the compromise, vis a vis CCTV surveillance of public places, was to have the camera record to an encrypted storage that is only unlocked
by andrepd 4y ago
I always thought that the compromise, vis a vis CCTV surveillance of public places, was to have the camera record to an encrypted storage that is only unlocked with a judicial warrant, just like a regular physical search needs a warrant.
You get the security of knowing criminals have their actions recorded, but you avoid the privacy catastrophe of being recorded 24/7 no matter where you go.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- than3 4y agoAlmost every solution I've seen in this space can be decrypted fairly easily because of a similar issue found years ago with SSL compression. I think it was the CRIME attack on SSL iirc. Same issue is found across most consumer-based systems (including drones), pretty much anything that uses compression can run into this issue if care is not taken to pad. At least from what I recall about it.