8 ms·
> via Bluetooth too Wouldn't recommend, bluetooth has the disadvantage of being very slow.
by mritzmann 3y ago
> via Bluetooth too
Wouldn't recommend, bluetooth has the disadvantage of being very slow.
- fyhfuhfg 3y agoi wrongly assumed BT5 would be ok sharing a 3G connection recently... oh how wrong i was. BT is pure garbage. after seeing the abysmal bandwidth i understood why every headphone becomes garbage when you start using the microphone channel. there's no hope for BT and it must go on favor of anything else from this century.
- MayeulC 3y ago> i understood why every headphone becomes garbage when you start using the microphone channel AFAIK, this is a codec issue, with most codecs not supporting bidirectional audio. IIRC, newer Bluetooth revisions tackle this.
- eptcyka 3y agoUSB2 speeds are better, but not that much.
- jeroenhd 3y agoUSB2 has a cap of 480mbps (includes overhead) while Bluetooth is stuck at several megabits per second (1.7 for Bluetooth 4, should be around double for Bluetooth 5). WiFi can easily beat USB2 but Bluetooth certainly can't.
- mjevans 3y agoUSB2 can do 480mbit (connection at least) and has the advantage of working properly even in a noisy wifi area.
- seba_dos1 3y agoWe're in 2023 though. I get about 1.6Gbps over my phone's CDC-NCM interface in iperf over USB 3.0.