> They're based on deontological arguments You clearly have absolutely no understanding of how "rights" work in the real world. There is no divine force enforc

> They're based on deontological arguments You clearly have absolutely no understanding of how "rights" work in the real world. There is no divine force enforcing your god-given right. There's only power. The reason the current "rights" even exist, is because they are enforced through power - if I steal from you, police comes over to my place and beats the shit out of me. Remove the police (and all other forms of power) from the equation, and you can wipe your ass with your "rights". Or in other words, deontology is just glorified astrology, a bunch of mumbo-jumbo poppycock. > By your view of rights raping someone would be okay if enough people want to do it. You're trying to reduce this argument to absurdity, but in many ancient civilizations, rape, in some contexts, was considered okay.