4 ms·
Rightist always have to make this strange argument where private property exist outside of the threat of violence. No private property in nature bud. The rules
by diordiderot 3y ago
Rightist always have to make this strange argument where private property exist outside of the threat of violence.
No private property in nature bud. The rules are what we decide they are.
You start from the premise that the property is yours, that it's belonging to you was granted via some divine right. It was granted by the state.
Edit: The only property you own is that which you can violently defend.
- alphanullmeric 3y agoI don’t recall making that argument. Instead, I’ll argue that both you and I believe in private property, so this isn’t a valid point you can use against me. The only difference being that I am consistent.
- fowtowmowcow 3y agoYou don't own anything because everything was given to you. You don't own the atoms that make you up. You don't own the air you breath. It's all social constructs however through these constructs societies may be built, art fashioned, science discovered, tools invented. What's up for debate is the best means for which to accomplish that.