4 ms·

I can't take an article seriously that refers to Mozilla's web browser as FireFox. What's next? SaFari? InterNet Explorer? What what it's worth, I've long stop

I can't take an article seriously that refers to Mozilla's web browser as FireFox. What's next? SaFari? InterNet Explorer? What what it's worth, I've long stopped using Firefox since the release of Chrome. The constant dealing with extensions not even trying to run after an upgrade and the need to constantly change settings in about:config to get extensions to function has caused me to abandon ship. It also seems like Mozilla is frantically trying to be more and more like Google Chrome with the rapid release cycles and plethora of other features ported over.

steve-howard 15y ago
FireFox is a reasonable mistake to make; it's a compound word. I sorta like Chrome, but I have found Tree Style Tabs for Firefox to be indispensable so I'll stick with it. Firefox's extension method is both very powerful (gives access to browser internals) and very brittle (gives access to browser internals). That, to me, means more-useful extensions that might break, which I'm okay with.