3 ms·
Your #1 is affirming the consequent.
by mumblemumble 3y ago
Your #1 is affirming the consequent.
- parasubvert 3y agoMy #1 is really attempt to say that OP’s question is a moot point. As in, there is no way that polling or analysis of polls will ever be stopped, so why even debate its societal value? It’s like saying “the world would be a better place if everyone started/stopped doing this one thing”. Okay?