14 ms·
> No matter how in touch one might feel with whatever mystic stuff out there, no matter how profound it might feel, I've yet to see any evidence whatsoever of t
by mistermann 4y ago
> No matter how in touch one might feel with whatever mystic stuff out there, no matter how profound it might feel, I've yet to see any evidence whatsoever of that somehow proving there effectively is something out there. Doesn't matter those feelings are very real, but it's just.. feelings.
Do you have a pretty diverse range of experiences on psychedelics backing this up?
- stinos 4y ago'back up' is a bit hard because of the anecdotal nature, but for me this is just the most logical explanation and as said: I have yet to see even the slightest piece of scientific evidence pointing to something else. Whereas there's enough of science supporting the way I think. I remain skeptical of course, though it's more of a 'I want to belive' type of thing.
- mistermann 4y ago> 'back up' is a bit hard because of the anecdotal nature, but for me this is just the most logical explanation "The most 'logical' explanation" is very often a function of psychedelic usage (and various other experiences one may have had, or not). > and as said: I have yet to see even the slightest piece of scientific evidence pointing to something else. Whereas there's enough of science supporting the way I think. In actual science, an abscence of evidence is not proof of abscence though. > I remain skeptical of course, though it's more of a 'I want to belive' type of thing. For both sides!