>Your ad hominem about artificial intelligences not being conscious or self-awareness and therefore less capable is neither provable or necessarily true. This

>Your ad hominem about artificial intelligences not being conscious or self-awareness and therefore less capable is neither provable or necessarily true. This is not the link I was going for. I never said AI is less capable because it is not self aware, and in fact I agreed it was valuable. My comment was about people seeing ChatGPT as an AGI, treating it as a conscious being, and just taking whatever output at face value. Apologies if I could have written that better. >it could still have some form of conscious experience This is where I break hard. This is just not true. LLMs are not conscious. The article demonstrates how ChatGPT doesn't have an inner monologue. It certainly isn't aware of its existence, no more than your toaster. And just increasing the number of parameters does not seem to affect this.