That is my point though. It's up to the EU to block sites they don't feel are compliant with the laws they have passed, which they don't have control over. Wha

That is my point though. It's up to the EU to block sites they don't feel are compliant with the laws they have passed, which they don't have control over. What is the point in claiming a law applies if they can't enforce it? Would it not make much more sense for the GDPR to have a provision blocking sites they can't control, or to allow for treaties between countries? It may allow both of those things already, in which case, it's even more perplexing to try and claim global jurisdiction as they do. And I don't need a cookie banner. The one I have is a subverion to make a point.