> Why wouldn't a "agreement" already be in place by the mere fact that those URLs are open to the entire world on purpose? An agreement is in place, it often j

> Why wouldn't a "agreement" already be in place by the mere fact that those URLs are open to the entire world on purpose? An agreement is in place, it often just isn't sufficient to cover what the third party is going to do with the data it gains access to. In those cases an explicit agreement is required. > Why can't EU citizens decide they WANT to contact google to download fonts? Banning that automatically doesn't sound very freedom-like. And how would an EU citizen make that choice? This is something the web designer decides, if the choice was presented to the user this would not be a problem.