3 ms·
I don't find the arguments either way particularly convincing. IMO just be consistent with the existing schema (if there is one), or use whatever you prefer.
by remus 3y ago
I don't find the arguments either way particularly convincing. IMO just be consistent with the existing schema (if there is one), or use whatever you prefer.
- heleninboodler 3y agoYes, this is bikeshedding at its worst. Just pick one. Preferably one that doesn't involve "clever" code that changes the names of things behind your back based on the English language's weird pluralization edge cases.
- wwweston 3y agoWhile there's a variation in how clever/complex pluralization code can be, there's only one class-table correspondence convention that doesn't end with codepaths trying some level of automatically changing the names of things behind your back... and it's singular table names.